SIR 2010-5250

Metadata:


Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Yager, R.M., and Ratcliffe, N.M.
Publication_Date: 2010
Title:
SIR 2010-5250
Edition: 1.0
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Series_Information:
Series_Name: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report
Issue_Identification: 2010-5250
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Reston, VA
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Online_Linkage: http://ny.water.usgs.gov/projects/rockland/
Larger_Work_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Yager, R.M., and Ratcliffe, N.M.
Publication_Date: 2010
Title:
Hydrogeology and simulation of groundwater flow in fractured rock in the Newark basin, Rockland County, New York
Edition: 1.0
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Series_Information:
Series_Name: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report
Issue_Identification: 2010-5245
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Reston, VA
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Other_Citation_Details:
Yager, R.M., and Ratcliffe, N.M., 2010, Hydrogeology and simulation of groundwater flow in fractured rock in the Newark basin, Rockland County, New York: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010-5250, 139 p.
Online_Linkage: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5250/
Description:
Abstract:
This is the metadata template for SIR 2010-5250
Purpose:
In support of water-resource evaluation of Rockland County.
Supplemental_Information:
This dataset is released as a part of a larger work described here.

Background:

Concerns over the state of water resources in Rockland County, NY, 
prompted an assessment of current (2005-07) conditions. The 
investigation included a review of all water resources but centered on
the Newark basin aquifer, a fractured-bedrock aquifer over which nearly 
300,000 people reside. Most concern has been focused on this aquifer 
because of (1) high summer pumping rates, with occasional entrained-air 
problems and an unexplained water-level decline at a monitoring well, (2) 
annual withdrawals that have approached or even exceeded previous 
estimates of aquifer recharge, and (3) numerous contamination problems 
that have caused temporary or long-term shutdown of production wells. 
Public water supply in Rockland County uses three sources of water in 
roughly equal parts:  (1) the Newark basin sedimentary bedrock aquifer, 
(2) alluvial aquifers along the Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers, and (3) 
surface waters from Lake DeForest Reservoir and a smaller, new
reservoir supply in the Highlands part of the county. Water withdrawals
from the alluvial aquifer in the Ramapo River valley and the Lake 
DeForest Reservoir are subject to water-supply application permits that 
stipulate minimum flows that must be maintained downstream into New 
Jersey. There is a need, therefore, at a minimum, to prevent any loss of the 
bedrock-aquifer resource--to maintain it in terms of both sustainable use 
and water-quality protection.

A regional conceptual model of the aquifer framework was needed upon 
which other regional and local hydrogeologic data could be overlaid to 
define the regional groundwater flow system. From that perspective, 
water-resource questions could be addressed from a regional context.

The framework of the Newark basin bedrock aquifer included 
characterization of (1) the structure and fracture occurrence associated 
with the Newark basin strata, (2) the texture and thickness of overlying 
glacial and alluvial deposits, (3) the presence of the Palisades sill and 
associated basaltic units on or within the Newark basin strata, and (4) the 
streams that drain the aquifer system. The structure of the aquifer was in 
part defined by previous geologic mapping, including strike and dip 
measurements of the sedimentary strata that fill the basin, and lithologic 
mapping that shows westward coarsening from mudstones and siltstones 
to conglomeratic sandstones. Borehole geophysical surveys were 
conducted at 24 wells and provided critical subsurface structural data. Other
data that contributed to the conceptual model of the aquifer framework 
included groundwater-level responses to pumping at production wells and 
groundwater and surface-water chemistry (particularly chloride). The strike 
of the tilted bedding constrains groundwater flow, because the most 
productive water-bearing fractures are subparallel to bedding. The general 
strike of bedding is north-northeast and the dip is about 10 degrees to the 
northwest. The regional groundwater flow system was delineated by 
overlaying aquifer-wide groundwater-level data on the bedrock framework 
(bedding strike lines). Groundwater divides were identified, including a major 
southeast to northwest regional divide that partitions groundwater flow 
northeastward to discharge at the Hackensack River and its tributaries and 
southwestward to discharge in the Mahwah River, Pascack Brook, and 
Saddle River drainages. 

Review of pumping-rate and water-level data from the bedrock aquifer during 
1989-2004 suggests that there is not a year-to-year, aquifer-wide downward 
trend in water levels. There have been periods of several years where water 
levels at individual wells show declines, and groundwater levels have declined 
in response to new stresses as production wells have come online, especially 
if the wells have been used continuously. Once pumping is initiated, water 
levels decline toward a new equilibrium, if possible. In fact, water levels in a 
large area of the most productive west-central part of the bedrock aquifer have 
declined because of withdrawals and depths to water in this part of the aquifer 
are the greatest (100-150 feet). 

The greatest concern regarding sustainability of groundwater resources is the 
aquifer response to the seasonal increase in pumping rates from May through 
October (an average increase of 25 percent in 2005). Investigation of pumping 
rates and water levels during these periods indicates that water levels in most 
wells decline beyond what is expected under natural conditions and that the 
effective aquifer yield can decrease as water levels drop or as entrained air 
from stressed aquifer conditions creates problems in the distribution system. 
Increases in pumping rates at certain productive well fields during summer 
result in water-level decline rates that are not sustainable and that represent 
the greatest stresses on the aquifer. Extrapolation of water-level decline rates 
under conditions of continuous pumping (a worst-case scenario, although the 
assumption of no decrease in aquifer yield over the summer is a best case 
scenario) indicates that between 10 and 15 wells would not be able to pump 
through the entire high-water-use season (May 15 to October 1). In most cases, 
pump rates would have to be reduced as aquifer yield declines. This analysis 
underlines the fragility of the aquifer given the fact that recent years (2003-06)
have been relatively wet. Large seasonal water-level fluctuations in the most 
productive part of the aquifer indicate that recharge during the non-growing 
season thus far has been enough to replenish the aquifer prior to the next 
growing season. Streams also are affected by seasonal increases in 
groundwater pumping rates; nearly all streams in the productive west-central 
area of the aquifer went dry during dry periods in late summer of 2005.

Impervious surfaces increase the amount of stormflow and decrease the amount 
of base flow in streams. Analysis of stormflows in watersheds with 11.9 and 17 
percent impervious surface area increased the percentage of rainfall that 
becomes stormflow in streams by 7 to 8 percent and by 12.5 to 16.5 percent, 
respectively.

Recharge was estimated from streamflow data and from groundwater-level data.
Estimates from across the county in 1961 ranged from 24.8 inches in the 
northwest (New York Highlands area) to 14.7 inches in the southeast. Recharge 
largely parallels the annual amount of precipitation. Recharge is probably 
highest in the Highlands because of high precipitation, despite crystalline 
bedrock that acts as a relatively poor aquifer. Across the county, the thickness of 
glacial deposits that mantle bedrock also appeared to be a major control on the 
amount of recharge. The distribution of monthly recharge was documented, 
including substantial recharge during the growing season in 2006.

Water budgets were generated for three basins with streamflow data. During 
1959-94 and in 2006, groundwater pumpage for public supply accounted for 12 
to 24 percent of recharge within the Mahwah River near Suffern, NY, watershed. 
Public-supply pumpage as a percentage of recharge in 2006 at the two other 
currently gaged watersheds (Pascack Brook and Saddle River) was 18 and 21 
percent, respectively. 

About 12.9 billion gallons of water was used in Rockland County in 2005. The 
majority (63 percent) was for base-line domestic supply (non-growing season 
rates of use); of this amount, about 6 percent was from domestic wells and 94 
percent was from production wells and reservoirs. Commercial, industrial, and 
institutional users made up 10 percent of total water use, and growing-season 
increases accounted for 18 percent.

Sanitary sewers serve much of Rockland County and the majority of treated 
wastewater is discharged to the Hudson River, which is an estuary with brackish 
water adjacent to Rockland County. Inflow of stormwater and infiltration of 
groundwater constitute a significant additional contribution of water to the 
sanitary sewer system.

Note: Citation for companion Rockland County aquifer modeling report is: Yager, 
R.M., and Ratcliffe, N.M., 2010, Hydrogeology and Simulation of Groundwater
Flow in Fractured Rock in the Newark Basin, Rockland County, New York: U.S.
Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010-5250, available at 
http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5250/.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2010
Currentness_Reference:
2010
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: None planned
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -74.295725
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -73.790302
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 41.397184
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 40.899923
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: Groundwater
Theme_Keyword: Hydrogeology
Theme_Keyword: Geohydrology
Theme_Keyword: inlandWaters
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints:
None.  Acknowledgement of the United States Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.) would be appreciated in products derived from these data.
Native_Data_Set_Environment:
Microsoft Windows XP Version 5.1 (Build 2600) Service Pack 3; ESRI ArcCatalog 9.3.1.4000
Back to Top
Data_Quality_Information:
Lineage:
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Metadata imported.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
S:\rocklandcounty\final\metadata\SIR2010-5245_metadata_template.xml
Process_Date: 20110125
Process_Time: 14310200
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Metadata imported.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
C:\DOCUME~1\XPMUser\LOCALS~1\Temp\xml1CC.tmp
Process_Date: 20111013
Process_Time: 11443200
Back to Top
Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Vector
Point_and_Vector_Object_Information:
SDTS_Terms_Description:
SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: G-polygon
Point_and_Vector_Object_Count: 1
Back to Top
Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Planar:
Grid_Coordinate_System:
Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
UTM_Zone_Number: 18
Transverse_Mercator:
Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.999600
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -75.000000
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0.000000
False_Easting: 500000.000000
False_Northing: 0.000000
Planar_Coordinate_Information:
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: coordinate pair
Coordinate_Representation:
Abscissa_Resolution: 0.000000
Ordinate_Resolution: 0.000000
Planar_Distance_Units: meters
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983
Ellipsoid_Name: Geodetic Reference System 80
Semi-major_Axis: 6378137.000000
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257222
Vertical_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Altitude_System_Definition:
Altitude_Resolution: 0.000100
Altitude_Encoding_Method: Explicit elevation coordinate included with horizontal coordinates
Back to Top
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: metadata_template
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: OBJECTID
Attribute_Definition:
Internal feature number.
Attribute_Definition_Source:
ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain:
Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Shape
Attribute_Definition:
Feature geometry.
Attribute_Definition_Source:
ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain:
Coordinates defining the features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Shape_Length
Attribute_Definition:
Length of feature in internal units.
Attribute_Definition_Source:
ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain:
Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Shape_Area
Attribute_Definition:
Area of feature in internal units squared.
Attribute_Definition_Source:
ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain:
Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.
Back to Top
Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Position: Ask USGS -- Water Webserver Team
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing address
Address:
445 National Center
City: Reston
State_or_Province: VA
Postal_Code: 20192
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 1-888-275-8747 (1-888-ASK-USGS)
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: http://water.usgs.gov/user_feedback_form.html
Resource_Description: Downloadable Data
Distribution_Liability:
Although this data set has been used by the U.S. GeologicalSurvey, U.S. 
Department of the Interior, no warranty expressed or implied is made by the 
U.S. Geological Survey as to the accuracyof the data and related materials. 
The act of distribution shall notconstitute any such warranty, and no 
responsibility is assumed by the U.S. Geological Survey in the use of this 
data, software, or related materials.

Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only 
and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Back to Top
Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20111013
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Person: REQUIRED: The person responsible for the metadata information.
Contact_Position: Ask USGS - Water Webserver Team
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing
Address:
445 National Center
City: Reston
State_or_Province: VA
Postal_Code: 20192
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 1-888-275-8747 (1-888-ASK-USGS)
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: http://water.usgs.gov/user_feedback_form.html
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998
Metadata_Time_Convention: local time
Metadata_Extensions:
Online_Linkage: http://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html
Profile_Name: ESRI Metadata Profile
Metadata_Extensions:
Online_Linkage: http://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html
Profile_Name: ESRI Metadata Profile
Back to Top